Waste Hierarchy
The 'waste hierarchy' is not perfect (more on that in another post soon!), but serves a useful purpose for this blog:
Waste Hierarchy |
It suggests that ideally, we'd prevent the use of packaging where possible, then minimise its use, then reuse, recycle, and eventually, if it can't be burned for energy, send to landfill.
WRAP continue to provide the industry with a series of voluntary agreements which support a range of initiatives aligned to the waste hierarchy's philosophy, via the Courtauld Commitment.
The importance of packaging
Food packaging serves a number of purposes:
- protecting the food from physical damage (e.g. an egg box)
- preventing contamination (e.g. vacuum-sealed meat packaging)
- storage (e.g. a yoghurt pot)
- convenience (e.g. bag of rice)
There are already responsibilities placed on the food packaging producers to minimise packaging where possible, and progress is being made. Personally, I'm still not convinced about Easter Eggs, with Sainsbury's trialling dedicated recycling facilities earlier this year.
Recycling packaging
I mentioned earlier that my council will happily take mixed recycling (it saves them - and therefore indirectly my council tax bill - on paying landfill tax), which means a lot of food packaging is recyclable:
- Plastic milk bottles
- Cans (baked beans, etc.)
- Card (egg boxes, frozen fish boxes, cereal, etc.)
- Tetra-pak cartons, e.g. fruit juices [not all councils support this yet]
Reusing packaging - the untapped opportunity?
Between prevention/minimisation of food packaging, and recycling is reuse... and this is where I wonder if more could be done? So, before it enters the recycling loop, the packaging is reused as many times as practically, and cost effectively, as possible.
The British consumer is starting to get used to using less single-use carrier bags, with various initiatives taking-place, either:
- from the Regional Governments:
- in Wales, the 5p charge has seen usage reduce by 96%
- a 5p charge in Northern Ireland
- the recent announcement to introduce a 5p charge in Scotland
- The Queen's Speech on June 4th set to outline legislation to introduce a compulsory 5p charge for single-use carrier bags in England, from October 2015 - UPDATE 05/10 - now effective.
- from retailers:
- e.g. M&S charges 5p
- Sainsbury's offers Nectar points for re-use, and Tesco offer Green Clubcard points
- Selling 'bags for life', (some with free replacements)
a.) Packaging for immediate refill at shop
In this model, rather than taking just their empty canvas bags to the shops, the consumer also takes some selective packaging, which they're happy to use as a receptacle for refilling at an in-store dispenser. This could be the same packaging for the product, or another container. It's a very similar concept to a trial which Asda ran for their fabric conditioner, in collaboration with WRAP.
b.) Packaging for return (then later reuse) at shop
This is where packaging is taken to a shop for re-use at a later date, by another consumer. The packaging would need to be sterilised and checked, either on-site, or at a central location, much like there used to be a monetary rebate for bringing back glass bottles.
c.) Packaging for return as part of home delivery
Much like option 'b' above, as one's shopping is delivered at home, the van-driver is able to collect packaging, for cleaning and reuse, not for recycling.
Heinz Fridge Pack |
Reusable Cereal Container (Source: Lakeland) |
Egg Box (Sainsbury's) |
Of course there are lots of practical considerations, e.g. contamination liabilities, spillage at 'disposal stations', needing to print updated 'use by' dates, and ensuring it's cost effective compared to simple recycling. It's a classic piece of Service Design, but I expect the challenges are easier to overcome than the perceived barriers of self checkouts, which are now commonplace. With the right incentives in-place (discounts, rebates, Nectar points, etc.), might this work?
Finally, where a supervisor is required at a food dispensing station, would this provide an excuse for a conversation - great for some parts of society who are lonely and crave the social interaction, plus a good excuse to reinforce the brand?
No comments:
Post a Comment